SRI-ENACT Consortium Prepares for Final Phase at Riga Plenary Meeting

SRI-ENACT Consortium Prepares for Final Phase at Riga Plenary Meeting

The SRI-ENACT project consortium held a productive plenary meeting on 13 September in Riga, marking a key milestone as the project enters its final phase, set for completion by May 2025. Hosted by the Riga Planning Region, the meeting brought together project partners to discuss critical upcoming steps aimed at enhancing the implementation of the Smart Readiness Indicator across Europe.

Key Upcoming Activities:

  • Information events across the 8 pilot countries to raise awareness and promote SRI adoption.
  • Further SRI assessments of buildings using the SRI-ENACT toolkit.
  • A series of training webinars for the public and future SRI Auditors.
  • Two final conferences to share outcomes and project achievements.
  • The second release of the SRI-ENACT decision support tool, enhancing the ability of stakeholders to apply SRI effectively.
  • The training of 120 new SRI Auditors to expand expertise in smart building readiness.

As the project moves forward, it aims to bolster the adoption of sustainable and energy-efficient technologies in buildings, reinforcing the importance of smart building solutions across Europe.

Preliminary results of the SRI assessment of the first buildings in the Czech Republic

Preliminary results of the SRI assessment of the first buildings in the Czech Republic

Preliminary results of the SRI assessment of the first buildings in the Czech Republic

 

SEVEn is member of consortium of SRI-ENACT project, funded by LIFE programme. Overall objective of the project is to promote, train experts and gain experience of smart readiness indicator. One of subtasks were development of SRI Toolkit was to assess first several buildings in pilot project countries.

The first SRI assessments using project SRI Toolkit was carried by our SEVEn’s internal auditors during spring 2024. The SRI auditors assessed 5 buildings, various types, sizes, construction year and building typology: hospital building, 2 schools, family house and renovated office building.

 

Hospital České Budějovice, building T13 – total score 22 %, class F

The SRI assessment is the state of the hospital after the planned modernisation and reconstruction. There is central hospital heating system, there is no general AC, no cooling system. The forced ventilation system works for about 80% of building.

Family House in Trhové Sviny – total score 3.4 %, class G

The original state of family house built in 70s provided useful information on SRI assessment of the building without specific “smart” systems. Heating system uses solid fuel boiler and there is electric water heater.

Elementary school in České Budějovice – total score 47.6 %, class E

The elementary school in České Budějovice (Bezdrevská street) gained very high SRI score. The assessment covers the state of the school after the planned modernisation and reconstruction. The new system will have individual room control, ventilation system with control based on CO2 levels and automatic lighting system. The smart monitoring system will control the heating and hot water production, based on the load of the building and predictive system in the central heating system.

 

Elementary school Tupolevova in Prague – total score 27.1 %, class F

The elementary school in Prague 9 district (aka Tupolevka) gained “average” rating according to SEVEn’s team assessments experiences. The building does not have several modern systems, such as cooling or ventilation and lacks then the high score. The heating system has individual room control system and covers advanced predictions.

Elementary school in Rožnov pod Radhoštěm – total score 16.2 %, class G

The current state of the elementary school in Rožnov pod Radhoštěm got the rating 16.2%. The building has central heating system with natural gas boiler. There is no forced ventilation, AC or dynamic building envelope.

 

The first experience showed that smart readiness indicator gives added value especially for new or newly upgraded buildings. The assessments and energy audits of building in the Czech Republic were focused generally on energy consumption and renewables. The SRI adds several more domains and views on the building stock in general. The first SRI assessments showed some challenging areas where Czech buildings have low scores: the energy flexibility and energy demand services, indoor air quality reporting, maintenance planning and benchmarking and energy storage. The SRI pilot phase is however ongoing and dozens of buildings will be assessed during upcoming months.

Pilot Assessments in Riga

Pilot Assessments in Riga

SRI-ENACT partner in Latvia – Riga Planning Region – has started the practical assessment of smart readiness in various types of buildings

 

In June, the SRI-ENACT partner in Latvia – the Riga Planning Region – started the first smart readiness assessments. The assessment of the smart readiness of buildings is carried out within the framework of Work Package 4 of the Project “Pilot Evaluation of the SRI-ENACT methodology and platform,”  where it is planned to gather the practical experience of the project partners in the field of smart readiness assessment of buildings. In order to achieve it, piloting activities are carried out in the partner countries of the project, including Latvia, which mainly include practical assessments of the smart readiness of buildings.

 

This task includes the application of Method A for the assessment of smart readiness of buildings, using the smart readiness assessment and decision-making tools developed within the framework of the SRI-ENACT project. In total, it is planned to carry out assessments in 120 different types of buildings, both public and commercial. The assessments will be conducted by twelve trained energy specialists, who will each conduct assessments of the smart readiness of ten buildings.

 

In order to ensure that the activities carried out within the project are synchronized with potential investments in the future, the Riga Planning Region cooperates with the Riga Energy Agency during the development of assessments, which provides access to the buildings selected for audits and will develop a proposal for making investments in the future based on the results of the smart readiness assessments.

 

The energy auditors of the Riga Planning Region have determined the following basic criteria for conducting assessments:

 

·       The building has an energy certificate
Floor area
  • The recommended building area, except for private residential houses, floor area exceeds 1,000 sq m
  • State, regional or local government buildings: floor area from 1,000 to 6,000 sq m
  • Historical buildings: floor area from 1,000 to 6,000 sq m
  • Office and commercial buildings: floor area from 1,000 to 20,000 sq m
  • Residential buildings: floor area from 1,000 to 6,000 sq m
  • Healthcare buildings: floor area from 1,000 to 100,000 sq m
  • Educational buildings: floor area from 1,000 to 20,000 sq m
Type of building Number of assessments to be carried out Year of construction
Primary and secondary schools around 30 buildings 1960 to 2000
Preschool educational institutions around 20 buildings 1960 to 2000
State, regional or local government buildings around 20 buildings 1960 to 2010
Apartment buildings around 30 buildings 1960 to 2024
Other types of buildings – office and commercial buildings, hotels, healthcare buildings, nursing homes, schools, historical buildings, state, regional or local government buildings around 20 buildings

·        1960 to 2000

·        Historical buildings 1930 to 1960

·        Office buildings: 1980 to 2024

 

The assessment of the smart readiness of buildings is carried out with the aim of assessing the level of automation of building engineering systems and their elements and the possibilities of effectively managing the building’s energy supply and climate control equipment. Method A is used to perform the tasks. It includes 27 smart readiness assessment services and applies to existing residential buildings and small non-residential buildings. The first 5 assessments of the smart readiness of buildings were completed in June, and recommendations were prepared for improving the smart readiness of the respective buildings. Please see below.

Building 1. Oskara Kalpaka Riga Crafts Elementary School

Address

1 Skrindu iela, Rīga, Latvia

Type of building / function

educational facility

Year of construction

1900

Floor area

4, 565 sq m

Energy efficiency class

F

SRI assessment / score

Here

 

Building 2. Riga Preschool Educational Facility No 11.
Address 3 Raņķa dambis, Riga, Latvia
Type of building / function educational facility
Year of construction 1977
Floor area 2, 292 sq m
Energy efficiency class E
SRI assessment / score Here

 

Building 3. Sports arena “Arkadija”
Address 9 Kojusalas iela, Rīga, Latvia
Type of building / function Sports facility
Year of construction 1965
Floor area 7, 213 sq m
Energy efficiency class B
SRI assessment / score Here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building 4. Ostvalda Secondary School
Address 20 Dammes iela, Riga, Latvia
Type of building / function Educational  facility
Year of construction 1974
Floor area 10, 078 sq m
Energy efficiency class C
SRI assessment / score Here

 

 

Building 5. Ilguciems Culture Centre
Address 27 Lidoņu iela, Riga, Latvia
Type of building / function Cultural  facility
Year of construction 1974
Floor area 3, 441 sq m
Energy efficiency class E
SRI assessment / score Here

 

 

 

Detailed information and recommendations for each building available upon request.

 

Compiled by Ilgvars Francis, SRI-ENACT expert at Riga Planning region

Ilgvars.francis@rpr.gov.lv

///

 

 

A research paper based on the work carried out for the SRI-ENACT project was presented at IISA2024

A research paper based on the work carried out for the SRI-ENACT project was presented at IISA2024

A research paper based on the work carried out for the SRI-ENACT project was presented at IISA2024

 

Researchers from the Decision Support Systems Laboratory at the National Technical University of Athens have conducted a study titled ‘‘Spotlighting the significance of the SRI methodological tailoring at country level: a case study in Greece’’. This research based on the work carried out within the SRI-ENACT project, explores how Smart Readiness Indicator methodologies can be effectively customized to fit the specific needs of individual countries, with Greece serving as a detailed case study.

 

Presented by Apostolos Arsenopoulos, an Electrical & Computer Engineer with an MSc and PhD from the National Technical University of Athens, the findings were showcased at the International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA2024) held in Chania in July 2024.

 

The study underscores the importance of adapting SRI methodologies to the climatic context of each country to enhance decision-making processes in various sectors. Key findings reveal that tailored SRI methodologies can significantly improve the accuracy and relevance of impact assessments, leading to better-informed policy decisions and resource allocation.

 

Read the paper here.

SRI ASSESSMENT CASE STUDY: GREEN POINT BUILDING

SRI ASSESSMENT CASE STUDY: GREEN POINT BUILDING

SRI ASSESSMENT CASE STUDY: GREEN POINT BUILDING

SRI assessment methodology, as defined by the EU commission, is quite ambitious about smartness of the buildings if we analyzed the defined functionality levels for each technical domain. There are lot of automatic controls, sensors, flexibility… And it should be ambitious, since we are aware of the technological development and rising awareness of EU citizens about energy efficiency, CO2 reduction and climate protection. We also know that buildings generate large amounts of gas emissions, and we need to do something to reverse these trends.

Renovation of the buildings is a long-term and expensive process, but fortunately we could also use smart technologies to control our consumption, which tends to be cheaper and not so complex solution.

But how smart are our buildings today and how could they be smarter? If we have smart buildings does that mean that we are more energy efficient?

The first step in answering is to check where we are, establish some ground levels and then plan the improvements.

SRI-ENACT project spent a lot of human resources to prepare for the assessment phase of the buildings around EU to execute the first step. It is quite an interesting step where we will get the first insights into smartness of the buildings on the most comprehensive assessment ever made, and be able to answer previous questions, at least on general level.

The best illustrations are real examples.

 

THE BUILDING

Our example is the Green Point Building that was built in Austria from 2018-2020 and has total are approximately 11.000 m2 (apartments and offices) https://green-point.at.

The building is characterized by the very high level of insulation (A+ energy performance certificate) and own energy production: solar panels on the roof and on the balconies (225 kW) with battery storage. The building has a connection to the district heating network for heating and domestic hot water (DHW). Although it is a new, modern building, it does not have colling equipment (only individual A/C for some offices), nor ventilation (only natural). It was considered to have exceptional insulation to provide good protection from high temperatures, which do not happen often in that geographical area.

There are also EV charging points installed, DC with max power 50 kW and AC with max power 22 kW. All energy loads and sources are monitored by the modern BACS allowing residents to have insight into consumption and profiles.

Additionally, apartments also have control of window shading based on the time of day.

To improve the safety and comfort of residents, the modern system for the alarming in case of water leakage is installed.

Based on the information, we can tell right away that the building was built in a smart way with the basic smart technologies applied.

Green Point Building, Wiener Neustadt

 

ELECTRICAL ENERGY (EV charging, Lighting)

Due to the high insulation and lack of larger physical loads (no A/C), the consumption of electrical energy is very low. The total production of PVs could be above of the total demand, on maximum levels, during when most of the produced energy is supplied back to the grid.

EV charging is controlled not to exceed the maximum allowed power and to distribute the charging power between chargers, and users can have insight using mobile app.

Public spaces, like corridors, stairs and similar are equipped with motion sensors for lighting.

 

HEAT ENERGY (Heating, domestic hot water)

Heat energy is used via the connection to district heating system in the city. The building has its own heat exchanger and supplies the apartments and offices with the energy for heating and domestic hot water. The price of heating energy is high but due to good insulation, it is not used in large amounts. Heating is controlled centrally in each apartment, as a standard solution.

 

MONITORING AND CONTROL:

All energy meters are monitored by the BACS system. The system comprises of single control computer collecting the meter data and cloud-based software for presentation and analysis.

 

ASSESSMENT

The assessment was done using a new online tool developed in line with the EU proposed SRI methodology, B option (full set of services). The data have been entered after the site visit with two main domains not included: Cooling and Ventilation. Those domains do not affect the SRI scoring and are not mandatory, but also do not contribute to the comfort and well-being. Other domains have functionalities on the first and, maximum, second level, resulting in SRI score of 20%. According to information about SRI assessments the maximum score for real life buildings in EU was “only” 65%. At least so far. Just to remind you that we already qualified SRI methodology as optimistic, but future proof.

As we have mentioned previously, the building has high energy efficiency (also reflected in the best impact SRI score of 35,5%), it is almost self-sufficient, even without highest smart technologies installed, and provides perfect basis for the improvements.

Due to the installed solar panels and battery storage, electrical energy is the best scored domain (56,6%), but since heating domain bears the highest weighting factor in Austria, the resulting score is degraded.

This assessment exercise was very useful in the way that we have enlightened what SRI assessment is and what to expect from the resulting scores. It states that smart technologies are not reserved for the newest buildings and that small investments could make us smarter, more efficient, more flexible and supporting the energy transition. There should be no disappointments with results in any direction, only boost for the new steps and new improvements.

For the Green Point building, implementation of smart technologies for optimal control of energy flows and flexibility services to the grid should significantly increase the SRI score, together with the possibility to install more RES in form of heat pumps to also allow higher comfort. We will stay in contact to follow them in their new ventures and check for the SRI again. We are hoping for bigger numbers!

SRI scoring sheet in April 2024